Why do Fuji files need special processing? All I can do is share my opinion based on my experience and skills in analysing images.
If you do things differently, that's fine. I understand, having done several variations of this article at this point, that regardless of what I write someone somewhere will take issue with this and disagree. It must be a useable solution for working with lots of images in a project, and it must support Fuji film simulation modes at a minimum.
I also have a minimum set of requirements. This is the standard for which I would aim. It should not look too "digital" but instead should have the quality to pass an editor in a magazine or submission to a stock agency. While I believe that much of this is subjective, there are also technical standards, which, I think, are not, and while different people might have different standards, for me, the image should look clean, and un-processed. It also depends heavily on the type of image, how you prefer to process, and so on. I'm basing this on processing thousands of Fuji files in many different applications. Bun in this context, I'm talking purely about technical image quality. There are, of course, more things that can enter into the equation, such as workflow, ease of use, and cost. In this context, though, I'm talking about what gives you the most natural-looking, and the most artefact-free results when working with Fuji raw files. The term "best" is often quite misleading because as I said, it's often subjective. Secondly, unlike the previous version of this post, I’m not going to say definitively if I think one is better than the others because I think they all have pros and cons, but I’m going to present them as options with notes as to why they might be better than others and what other things you should know. If you prefer a different option, that’s totally up to you. But, in this post, I’m only going to talk about the solutions that I would personally recommend. So, in the past, I've tried to present many different options, and let people decide for themselves. What I might find the "best" isn't necessarily what someone else might find the best for them. So, what are the best options for Fujifilm raw processing in 2022? (In my opinion) However, over the past two years since the last time I updated this, there have been a few changes to the landscape, and so it’s time to write an updated version. I’ve covered it extensively in the past, including a previous version of this article.
#Capture one fuji software
I'd love to hear in the comments your experiences with both and any other software that you use for your Fuji files.The topic of how best to process Fuji raw files has been a long-running topic on this website. I do think I will be moving over to Capture One for the raw editing of Fuji files and using it in conjunction with Lightroom, as you can edit in Lightroom as an external editor. In the quick video, I take a look at the interface of both software and speed and edit the above image to see the relative differences and the handling of the Fuji files, which is apparent from the outset. I am preferring the final outcome due to the starting point of the raw files. With the edits I've completed so far in Capture One. Yes, it may not have the same cataloging or file management facilities, but as I'm still learning my way around it, the sessions seem to be the way for me to go, but perhaps there's a better option I've still to discover.įrom the outset, the color and sharpness handling is very apparent when put side by side with the Lightroom edit, and understandably, I tackled the edits slightly differently due to this.
If this is the starting point for an edit, sometimes, the result can be a little disappointing, although that is not always the case.Īs a new user when it comes to Capture One, I can see why some claim it has a steeper learning curve for newbies, but if you are already a Lightroom user, it's not too dissimilar in terms of layout and usability. This is not always the case and is only really noticeable when zoomed to 100%. However, one of my main criticisms is its handling of Fuji files, as it appears to produce a slightly soft smearing effect.
#Capture one fuji plus
The interface is intuitive and now very familiar, plus it's also easy to navigate and learn and integrates seamlessly with Photoshop and the plugins I use. Lightroom has been my go-to software for editing all of my raw files for Fuji and Nikon. Inspired by Ivor Rackham's recent article, Lightroom Versus ON1 Photo Raw 2023, I decided to test out the differences in the handling of the Fuji files to see what software would best suit my purposes.
0 kommentar(er)
